Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Avalor Technologies, Ltd.

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
67% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN 2 50.0% +78.6%
NANO, SARGON N 1 80.7% -1.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18672456 Techniques for continuous representation of discrete data models in a cybersecurity management system NANO, SARGON N

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19170332 Exposure and Attack Surface Management Using a Data Fabric POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN
18176151 TECHNIQUES FOR THE UNIFICATION OF RAW CYBER DATA COLLECTED FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES FOR VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2443 1
2436 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19170332 Exposure and Attack Surface Management Using a Data Fabric POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN §103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 04, 2025
18672456 Techniques for continuous representation of discrete data models in a cybersecurity management system NANO, SARGON N 2443 §101 Non-Final OA Pending May 23, 2024
18176151 TECHNIQUES FOR THE UNIFICATION OF RAW CYBER DATA COLLECTED FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES FOR VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN 2436 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 28, 2023

Managing Avalor Technologies, Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month