Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

Avectas Limited

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
2
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, QUANG 1 38.1% +53.0%
BEISNER, WILLIAM H 1 61.6% +29.3%
HURST, JONATHAN M 1 53.3% +18.4%
WESTON, ALYSSA G 1 60.0% +51.3%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18263359 DELIVERY PLATFORM BEISNER, WILLIAM H

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17337294 CELL ENGINEERING PLATFORM HURST, JONATHAN M 79d overdue
17012748 ENGINEERING OF IMMUNE CELLS FOR EX VIVO CELL THERAPY APPLICATIONS WESTON, ALYSSA G 15d
18509634 VECTOR-FREE DELIVERY OF GENE EDITING PROTEINS AND COMPOSITIONS TO CELLS AND TISSUES NGUYEN, QUANG
18263359 DELIVERY PLATFORM BEISNER, WILLIAM H

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1799 2
1631 1
1633 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18509634 VECTOR-FREE DELIVERY OF GENE EDITING PROTEINS AND COMPOSITIONS TO CELLS AND TISSUES NGUYEN, QUANG 1631 §112DPOther Final Rejection Pending Nov 15, 2023
18263359 DELIVERY PLATFORM BEISNER, WILLIAM H 1799 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 28, 2023
17337294 CELL ENGINEERING PLATFORM HURST, JONATHAN M 1799 §103 Non-Final OA 79d overdue Pending Jun 02, 2021
17012748 ENGINEERING OF IMMUNE CELLS FOR EX VIVO CELL THERAPY APPLICATIONS WESTON, ALYSSA G 1633 §112 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Sep 04, 2020

Managing Avectas Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month