Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Avonlea Technology Holdings Corp. is currently navigating 2 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, which indicates that each pending matter is being reviewed by a different official. The portfolio shows 0 distinct art units for these active cases, pointing to a concentrated area of examination despite the involvement of multiple personnel.
MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner handles 1 of the 2 pending office actions. The distribution of the workload across the 2 distinct examiners suggests a balanced but limited prosecution landscape. Practitioners should monitor both examiners to ensure consistent progress across the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE | 1 | 81.8% | +2.5% |
| DRODGE, JOSEPH W | 1 | 78.2% | +38.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18832838 | LITHIUM RECOVERY FROM BRINE | MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18695660 | WATER EMULSIONS SEPARATION SYSTEM AND PROCESS | DRODGE, JOSEPH W | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18832838 | LITHIUM RECOVERY FROM BRINE | MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE | — | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 24, 2024 |
| 18695660 | WATER EMULSIONS SEPARATION SYSTEM AND PROCESS | DRODGE, JOSEPH W | — | §103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial