Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Awak Technologies Pte. Ltd. manages 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, KIM, SUN U, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The work is contained within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific and focused area of patent prosecution. This structure allows the company to concentrate its efforts on a single technical division within the patent office. The 1 pending office action is the only active matter currently being tracked.
With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution path is straightforward and centralized. KIM, SUN U is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending case, which means the company's current legal efforts are focused on one examiner's review. This arrangement minimizes administrative complexity for the 1 pending office action. Practitioners can work directly with KIM, SUN U to address the requirements of the 1 busiest examiner pending matter. The consistency provided by 1 distinct art unit helps in maintaining a clear prosecution strategy for the company's chemical innovations.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, SUN U | 1 | 78.2% | +11.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18286456 | DEVICES FOR DETECTING INFECTION FROM PERITONEAL DIALYSIS | KIM, SUN U | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18286456 | DEVICES FOR DETECTING INFECTION FROM PERITONEAL DIALYSIS | KIM, SUN U | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1777 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18286456 | DEVICES FOR DETECTING INFECTION FROM PERITONEAL DIALYSIS | KIM, SUN U | 1777 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAwak Technologies Pte. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Sun U Kim has the most, with 1 of Awak Technologies Pte. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
