Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Awl-Techniek B V has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. BENEDIK, JUSTIN M is the busiest examiner for the company, managing the 1 pending office action. This concentration suggests a specific technical focus for the company's current patent activity.
Practitioners can expect a streamlined prosecution process as all active matters are consolidated under a single examiner and art unit. Having 1 distinct examiner for the pending office action allows for a more focused prosecution strategy without the need to reconcile different examiner styles. The presence of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the technical evaluation remains within a specific classification of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
This concentration of resources and examination personnel simplifies the management of the company's active intellectual property filings. Because the busiest examiner is responsible for the only pending matter, the company's immediate prosecution success depends on this single relationship. This structure provides a clear and singular point of contact for the company's active intellectual property matters at the patent office within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BENEDIK, JUSTIN M | 1 | 86.0% | +10.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722310 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENGAGING A PRODUCT FOR PRODUCT HANDLING | BENEDIK, JUSTIN M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722310 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENGAGING A PRODUCT FOR PRODUCT HANDLING | BENEDIK, JUSTIN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3652 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722310 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENGAGING A PRODUCT FOR PRODUCT HANDLING | BENEDIK, JUSTIN M | 3652 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAwl-Techniek B V has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Justin M Benedik has the most, with 1 of Awl-Techniek B V's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
