Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Axogen Corporation

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
2
Unknown (67%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
No statute on record2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LU, TOM Y 1 87.8% +3.1%
MARCSISIN, ELLEN JEAN 1 32.8% +48.6%
DORNA, CARRIE R 1 72.2% +28.3%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17811108 CAPTURE TOOL DORNA, CARRIE R 23d overdue
18145873 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF LAMININ BETA-1 SUBUNIT WITHIN TISSUE MARCSISIN, ELLEN JEAN 30d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2667 1
1677 1
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18501364 QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURAL ASSAY OF A NERVE GRAFT LU, TOM Y 2667 Other Final Rejection 29d Pending Nov 03, 2023
18145873 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF LAMININ BETA-1 SUBUNIT WITHIN TISSUE MARCSISIN, ELLEN JEAN 1677 §103 Final Rejection 30d Pending Dec 23, 2022
17811108 CAPTURE TOOL DORNA, CARRIE R 3791 Other Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Jul 07, 2022

Managing Axogen Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month