1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ayass Bioscience LLC maintains a company patent portfolio that currently features 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to GIBBS, TERRA C, who is the busiest examiner for the company. Because GIBBS, TERRA C is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action, the company's current prosecution activity is entirely centered on this 1 examiner's review. This concentration allows the company to focus its resources on a single set of examiner communications and requirements.
The data shows that the portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This level of concentration suggests that the company's innovations are situated within a specific technical niche, even though a broader technology area is not specified. For a patent practitioner, the presence of 1 distinct art unit simplifies the prosecution process by limiting the procedural rules to those of a single administrative division. Additionally, having 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action allows for a more personalized and consistent interaction with the patent office. This streamlined profile reduces the need to manage multiple examiner styles or conflicting art unit requirements, allowing for a targeted and efficient patent acquisition strategy. The focus on 1 pending office action under 1 examiner provides a clear path for the company's intellectual property objectives.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIBBS, TERRA C | 1 | 63.7% | +10.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18527822 | Checkpoint Aptamers as Therapeutics for Cancer Treatment | GIBBS, TERRA C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18527822 | Checkpoint Aptamers as Therapeutics for Cancer Treatment | GIBBS, TERRA C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 4100 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18527822 | Checkpoint Aptamers as Therapeutics for Cancer Treatment | GIBBS, TERRA C | 4100 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial