Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Azova, Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and are distributed across 2 distinct art units. This structure indicates that each of the company's pending matters is being handled by a different official in a different USPTO division. The busiest examiner, CHNG, JOY POH AI, is responsible for 1 pending action.
For a practitioner, this means there is no concentration of work that would allow for a unified prosecution strategy. Each of the 2 pending office actions must be managed independently, accounting for the unique preferences of the 2 distinct examiners. The 2 distinct art units suggest that the company's transportation and e-commerce technologies are being reviewed under different specialized guidelines. With 2 actions and 2 examiners, the company's current prosecution experience is entirely varied. The outcome of the 2 pending matters will depend on the specific interactions within these 2 separate examiner and art unit pairings. This decentralized approach requires the legal team to adapt to two different sets of examiner expectations and procedural nuances within the mechanical systems category.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHNG, JOY POH AI | 1 | 60.6% | +19.0% |
| PRESTON, JOHN O | 1 | 28.4% | +7.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18787015 | TELEMEDICINE PRACTITIONER ONBOARDING WITH ON-DEMAND PER ENCOUNTER MALPRACTICE LIABILITY COVERAGE | PRESTON, JOHN O | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19191061 | TELEMEDICINE CLINIC SYSTEMS AND METHODS | CHNG, JOY POH AI | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3683 | 1 |
| 3693 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19191061 | TELEMEDICINE CLINIC SYSTEMS AND METHODS | CHNG, JOY POH AI | 3683 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 28, 2025 |
| 18787015 | TELEMEDICINE PRACTITIONER ONBOARDING WITH ON-DEMAND PER ENCOUNTER MALPRACTICE LIABILITY COVERAGE | PRESTON, JOHN O | 3693 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAzova, Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Joy Poh Ai Chng has the most, with 1 of Azova, Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
