Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
B. G. Negev Technologies and Applications Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. UNDERWOOD, BAKARI is the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Each of the 2 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different examiner in a different art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNDERWOOD, BAKARI | 1 | 67.6% | +18.0% |
| LEWIS, IYONDA LATIFAH | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18681057 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING LOCATION DATA, BASED ON IDENTIFIERS TRANSMITTED FROM MOBILE DEVICE | LEWIS, IYONDA LATIFAH | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18846007 | CLOUD-BASED SENSING AND CONTROL USING AUTOMOTIVE RADAR NETWORK | UNDERWOOD, BAKARI | 14d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3663 | 1 |
| 2647 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18846007 | CLOUD-BASED SENSING AND CONTROL USING AUTOMOTIVE RADAR NETWORK | UNDERWOOD, BAKARI | 3663 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Sep 11, 2024 |
| 18681057 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING LOCATION DATA, BASED ON IDENTIFIERS TRANSMITTED FROM MOBILE DEVICE | LEWIS, IYONDA LATIFAH | 2647 | §103 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Feb 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialB. G. Negev Technologies and Applications Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Bakari Underwood has the most, with 1 of B. G. Negev Technologies and Applications Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
