Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

B.T.G. Advanced Biofuel Company B.V.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

B.T.G. Advanced Biofuel Company B.V. is managing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution is being conducted by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very specific technical focus for the company's current active patent applications. The use of 1 distinct art unit allows the applicant to focus their efforts on the specific guidelines and technical expertise of a single group within the USPTO.

GOLOBOY, JAMES C serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate prosecution outcomes are tied to this individual. The 1 pending office action represents the total active volume currently requiring attention within the specified 1 distinct art unit. This examiner, GOLOBOY, JAMES C, is the sole reviewer for the firm's active matters. Practitioners should prepare for a concentrated interaction with this 1 distinct examiner to resolve the 1 pending office action. The centralization of the portfolio simplifies the management of the current active cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GOLOBOY, JAMES C 1 63.7% +8.7%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1771 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18576180 Hydrotreatment of Vegetable Biomass GOLOBOY, JAMES C 1771 §102 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Jan 03, 2024

Managing B.T.G. Advanced Biofuel Company B.V.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month