Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
BASSMOTO LLC is managing 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, which indicates a focused intellectual property strategy. The concentration in a single art unit simplifies the monitoring of relevant examination trends for the communications technologies involved. This singular focus means that prosecution outcomes are currently tied to a specific technical niche within the broader communications field, allowing for a highly targeted legal approach. Practitioners can prioritize resources to address the specific technical niche identified by this art unit assignment.
SNIEZEK, ANDREW L is the busiest examiner, responsible for the 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution path is direct and depends on a single point of contact at the patent office. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of this examiner and the 1 distinct art unit to advance the 1 pending action toward resolution. Analyzing the examiner's history within this assigned unit can provide valuable insights into the likely progression of the case and help in crafting a more effective response. This centralized approach ensures that all legal efforts are concentrated on the specific criteria established by the current examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNIEZEK, ANDREW L | 1 | 84.9% | +8.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18333266 | DETACHABLE AMPLIFIER AND SPEAKER MODULE | SNIEZEK, ANDREW L | 100d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2693 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18333266 | DETACHABLE AMPLIFIER AND SPEAKER MODULE | SNIEZEK, ANDREW L | 2693 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 100d overdue | Pending | Jun 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial