Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Batten Industries Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution is handled by a distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This reflects a specific technical concentration for the company's current filings. Having a single point of contact at the office allows for a highly focused prosecution strategy tailored to the specific requirements of the assigned group.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is OLIVER, BRADLEY S, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This constitutes the entirety of the company's pending workload. Having only one distinct examiner and one distinct art unit means the prosecution process is highly focused. Practitioners should analyze the individual tendencies of OLIVER, BRADLEY S and the specific requirements of the art unit.
The presence of the pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area indicates a targeted filing strategy. Success will depend on a deep understanding of the art unit's prior art landscape and the examiner's past behavior. This focused approach is common for entities with specialized innovations in the medical device sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLIVER, BRADLEY S | 1 | 60.9% | +14.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18721067 | REFILLABLE PERSONAL HYGIENE PRODUCT DISPENSER | OLIVER, BRADLEY S | 62d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18721067 | REFILLABLE PERSONAL HYGIENE PRODUCT DISPENSER | OLIVER, BRADLEY S | 3754 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 62d | Pending | Jun 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial