Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Battle Court Jai Alai LLC has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This workload is distributed across 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a narrow focus for the current portfolio.
The company's activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, which simplifies the procedural landscape for their intellectual property assets. KIM, KEVIN Y serves as the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action.
With 1 pending office action total, the prosecution risk is centralized under KIM, KEVIN Y. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit indicates that the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering filings are not currently diversified across different examination groups at the patent office. For the practitioner, the reliance on 1 distinct examiner suggests that the firm's strategy must be tailored specifically to the historical tendencies of that individual. This concentrated environment provides a very stable but singular administrative path.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| No statute on record | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, KEVIN Y | 1 | 78.2% | +15.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19200119 | HEAD-TO-HEAD JAI ALAI WAGERING SYSTEM AND METHOD | KIM, KEVIN Y | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19200119 | HEAD-TO-HEAD JAI ALAI WAGERING SYSTEM AND METHOD | KIM, KEVIN Y | 3715 | — | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 06, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial