Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
BB INVENTIONS INC. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Networking & Security technology area. This single action is assigned to a distinct examiner working across 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of work suggests a highly specialized or narrow portfolio focus at this stage of prosecution. The presence of 1 distinct art unit simplifies the procedural landscape for the applicant by centralizing the technical review process.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there is only a single pending office action in total, this examiner handles the entirety of the company's current workload. This alignment between the total volume and the busiest examiner's load indicates no distribution of tasks across multiple personnel. The interaction with PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY represents the sole point of contact for the current pending matters.
Practitioners should note that the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the feedback from 1 distinct examiner. This singular focus allows for a deep dive into the examiner's specific preferences to resolve the 1 pending office action. Understanding the specific requirements of PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY is essential for the 1 busiest examiner pending action. This focused approach may lead to more consistent outcomes within the Networking & Security sector by avoiding the complexities of multiple examiner styles.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY | 1 | 87.5% | +3.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18691146 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACHIEVING A CONSENSUS AND ITS USE THEREOF | PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY | 9d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2492 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18691146 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACHIEVING A CONSENSUS AND ITS USE THEREOF | PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY | 2492 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 9d overdue | Pending | Mar 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial