Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Beamm Technologies Inc.

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Beamm Technologies Inc. is currently navigating 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to a distinct examiner, BADER, ROBERT N., who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is localized within a distinct art unit, reflecting a concentrated technical review process. This focus in both examiner and art unit simplifies the current prosecution tracking for the company.

With only 1 pending office action, the company's current activity is entirely dependent on the review of BADER, ROBERT N., who holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. The placement of this case in the distinct art unit indicates that the Communications technology being patented is being evaluated by a specific specialized group. Because there is a distinct examiner for the pending office action, the company can focus its legal resources on a point of contact at the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BADER, ROBERT N. 1 44.6% +26.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18954183 EXTENDED REALITY AUTHORING SYSTEM AND METHOD BADER, ROBERT N. 28d

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18954183 EXTENDED REALITY AUTHORING SYSTEM AND METHOD BADER, ROBERT N. 28d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2611 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18954183 EXTENDED REALITY AUTHORING SYSTEM AND METHOD BADER, ROBERT N. 2611 §103§112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Nov 20, 2024

Managing Beamm Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month