Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Beauceron Security Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is handled by a distinct examiner and a single art unit. The focus on this technology area indicates that the company's current patenting efforts are directed toward medical or mechanical systems.
BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N is the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action, representing the total pending volume for the portfolio. Centralizing the workload with a single examiner allows for a consistent dialogue between the applicant and the USPTO, though it also means the prosecution path is set by one individual's interpretation.
For the practitioner, this structure requires a deep understanding of the assigned examiner's preferences and the standards of the medical devices art unit. The alignment of the technology area with the art unit suggests that the application is being reviewed by specialists in this field. Success will require a focused strategy that addresses the specific prior art and technical challenges identified by the examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N | 1 | 55.9% | +36.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18326537 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CYBERSECURITY SIMULATION AND TRAINING | BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18326537 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CYBERSECURITY SIMULATION AND TRAINING | BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18326537 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CYBERSECURITY SIMULATION AND TRAINING | BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N | 3715 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | May 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial