Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Beaumont Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current intellectual property efforts are focused on a specific chemical or material science application. The use of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technical review is being performed by a specialized group within the USPTO's chemistry division.
The busiest examiner, BARTLETT, VICTORIA, is assigned 1 pending office action. This examiner represents the full extent of the company's current pending matters. With the workload concentrated in 1 art unit and under 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution process is highly centralized. This centralization means that the company's immediate patent outcomes are subject to the specific interpretations and examination standards of this single USPTO official. For practitioners, the focus on BARTLETT, VICTORIA means that the prosecution strategy should be tailored to this examiner's specific history and tendencies. The data shows that the 1 pending office action is the sole focus of the company's current patenting activity.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARTLETT, VICTORIA | 1 | 51.0% | +29.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17285873 | Method for Predicting a Polymer's Pressure, Flow Rate, and Temperature Relationship While Flowing within an Injection Mold | BARTLETT, VICTORIA | 74d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1744 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17285873 | Method for Predicting a Polymer's Pressure, Flow Rate, and Temperature Relationship While Flowing within an Injection Mold | BARTLETT, VICTORIA | 1744 | §103 | Final Rejection | 74d overdue | Pending | Apr 15, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBeaumont Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Victoria Bartlett has the most, with 1 of Beaumont Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
