Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Beekley Corporation currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 2 distinct examiners, indicating a spread of oversight even within a focused technical domain. Despite this distribution, the workload is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a specific regulatory path for these applications.
The busiest examiner identified in the portfolio is BUI PHO, PASCAL M, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This represents a significant portion of the active prosecution for the entity. Practitioners should note that with only 2 distinct examiners involved, the examiner-specific trends will heavily influence the overall success rate of the portfolio.
The concentration in 1 distinct art unit simplifies the administrative landscape for the 2 pending office actions. However, the involvement of 2 distinct examiners means that different interpretive styles may still apply to the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering filings. Monitoring the specific requirements of BUI PHO, PASCAL M is essential for managing the 1 pending office action under their review.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUI PHO, PASCAL M | 1 | 63.6% | -18.7% |
| RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL | 1 | 55.5% | +21.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17456508 | IMAGING MARKER AND METHOD | RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL | 43d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3798 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17456516 | IMAGING MARKER AND METHOD | BUI PHO, PASCAL M | 3798 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 30d overdue | Pending | Nov 24, 2021 |
| 17456508 | IMAGING MARKER AND METHOD | RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL | 3798 | §103§112DP | Final Rejection | 43d overdue | Pending | Nov 24, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBeekley Corporation has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
Pascal M Bui Pho has the most, with 1 of Beekley Corporation's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
