Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Beelinx Usa L L C has 3 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This structure indicates a slight concentration in the company's communications-related prosecution, as the number of actions exceeds the count of 2 distinct examiners and art units involved.
ALAM, FAYYAZ is the busiest examiner, handling 2 of the 3 pending office actions. This concentration means that a majority of the company's current communications-related prosecution is being decided by a single examiner, making this individual's review style particularly influential. The remaining action is handled by a different examiner in a separate art unit. With 2 distinct art units in play, the company must manage two different technical perspectives while focusing heavily on the feedback from ALAM, FAYYAZ. This examiner's decisions will significantly impact the overall success of the communications portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAM, FAYYAZ | 1 | 83.4% | +11.2% |
| GIERINGER, MELINDA J | 1 | 33.8% | +22.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19033234 | URBAN MOBILE NETWORK SYSTEM | ALAM, FAYYAZ | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18782915 | USE OF LOCALIZED BROADCAST SIGNALS TO MODIFY MOBILE APPLICATION BEHAVIOR | GIERINGER, MELINDA J | 84d overdue |
| 19033234 | URBAN MOBILE NETWORK SYSTEM | ALAM, FAYYAZ | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2646 | 1 |
| 3622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19033234 | URBAN MOBILE NETWORK SYSTEM | ALAM, FAYYAZ | 2646 | §102§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 21, 2025 |
| 18782915 | USE OF LOCALIZED BROADCAST SIGNALS TO MODIFY MOBILE APPLICATION BEHAVIOR | GIERINGER, MELINDA J | 3622 | §112Other | Final Rejection | 84d overdue | Pending | Jul 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBeelinx Usa L L C has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Fayyaz Alam has the most, with 1 of Beelinx Usa L L C's pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
