Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
BEIJING DIPEAK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD holds a company patent portfolio featuring 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This prosecution activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a narrow technical scope for the pending matter. The case is handled by 1 distinct examiner, BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently active.
The concentration of the entire pending portfolio under BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y means that the prosecution strategy is focused on a single point of contact. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the legal approach can be specialized to the specific software examination guidelines relevant to that unit. This 1 to 1 relationship between the action and the examiner eliminates the need for cross-examiner consistency checks, placing the full emphasis on the specific interactions with this 1 official. The applicant must ensure that the technical arguments are robust enough to satisfy the specific scrutiny of this single examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y | 1 | 75.5% | +10.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19149840 | DATA QUERY METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19149840 | DATA QUERY METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2156 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19149840 | DATA QUERY METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | BROMELL, ALEXANDRIA Y | 2156 | §101 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Jul 21, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial