Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Beme Health Inc. is currently navigating 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's innovations are being reviewed from multiple technical angles. This lack of concentration across 2 distinct art units means that the prosecution of each of the 2 pending office actions is isolated from the other.
The busiest examiner, SAHAND, SANA, is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given that there are 2 distinct examiners in total, the current workload is split, with each examiner overseeing 1 of the 2 pending office actions. This distribution in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector indicates a diversified approach to the current docket.
Practitioners should prepare for distinct examination styles, as the 2 pending office actions are being evaluated by 2 distinct examiners. The presence of 2 distinct art units further confirms that the portfolio is subject to different sets of internal guidelines. With only 1 busiest examiner pending action, the firm's immediate patent strategy is not overly dependent on any single individual's interpretation.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAHAND, SANA | 1 | 63.4% | +23.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18129794 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION, MATCHING NEEDS, AND PREDICTING CONTENT AND EXPERIENCES FOR IMPROVING MENTAL HEALTH | SAHAND, SANA | 26d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18129794 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION, MATCHING NEEDS, AND PREDICTING CONTENT AND EXPERIENCES FOR IMPROVING MENTAL HEALTH | SAHAND, SANA | 26d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18129794 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION, MATCHING NEEDS, AND PREDICTING CONTENT AND EXPERIENCES FOR IMPROVING MENTAL HEALTH | SAHAND, SANA | 3796 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 26d overdue | Pending | Mar 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial