Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Bemis Associates Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Bemis Associates Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units.

FISCHER, JUSTIN R is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. Because each of the 2 pending actions is assigned to a different examiner and art unit, the company faces a decentralized prosecution process across multiple divisions of the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FISCHER, JUSTIN R 1 44.2% +2.5%
IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE 1 33.5% +24.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18652069 ADHESIVE PATCH AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1749 1
1789 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18734819 SEAM TAPES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME FISCHER, JUSTIN R 1749 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 05, 2024
18652069 ADHESIVE PATCH AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE 1789 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2024

Managing Bemis Associates Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Bemis Associates Inc. have?

Bemis Associates Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Bemis Associates Inc. applications?

Justin R Fischer has the most, with 1 of Bemis Associates Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Bemis Associates Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month