Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Better Collective Usa Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly concentrated prosecution focus at this stage of the company's patent development. By operating within a specific art unit, the company is navigating a set of examination standards and precedents unique to that technical niche. This focus allows for a deep understanding of the local examination culture but limits the diversity of the portfolio's legal exposure.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is FEACHER, LORENA R, who is responsible for the pending workload currently awaiting a response. Because the prosecution is handled by a lone official, the legal strategy remains localized, requiring the applicant to tailor their arguments to the specific tendencies and historical rejection patterns of this individual. This level of concentration suggests that the immediate success of the company's intellectual property strategy is heavily dependent on the outcome of this interaction within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector, as there are no other active cases to provide a broader perspective.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEACHER, LORENA R | 1 | 28.5% | +32.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18650611 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CUMULATIVE SERIES EVENT PREDICTION | FEACHER, LORENA R | 154d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18650611 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CUMULATIVE SERIES EVENT PREDICTION | FEACHER, LORENA R | 154d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18650611 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CUMULATIVE SERIES EVENT PREDICTION | FEACHER, LORENA R | 3625 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 154d overdue | Pending | Apr 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial