Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
BH Electrics LLC is managing 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are distributed between 2 distinct examiners, requiring the company to address different sets of examiner feedback. The cases are also situated in 2 distinct art units, which points to a diversity in the technical classification of the company's chemical innovations. This spread prevents a single administrative unit from controlling the entire portfolio's progress.
CHMIELECKI, SCOTT J is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. With 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is divided among the 2 distinct examiners. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company is developing technologies that span different sub-sectors of the Chemistry & Materials field. Consequently, the prosecution strategy must be flexible enough to accommodate the varying standards of two different art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHMIELECKI, SCOTT J | 1 | 79.7% | +19.8% |
| RUSHING, JR, BOBBY | 1 | 76.5% | +12.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18328326 | Electric Motor Drive Train Conversion Assembly | RUSHING, JR, BOBBY | 31d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18328326 | Electric Motor Drive Train Conversion Assembly | RUSHING, JR, BOBBY | 31d overdue |
| 18526886 | Modular Battery Enclosure | CHMIELECKI, SCOTT J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1729 | 1 |
| 3618 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18526886 | Modular Battery Enclosure | CHMIELECKI, SCOTT J | 1729 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 01, 2023 |
| 18328326 | Electric Motor Drive Train Conversion Assembly | RUSHING, JR, BOBBY | 3618 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 31d overdue | Pending | Jun 02, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBH Electrics LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Scott J Chmielecki has the most, with 1 of BH Electrics LLC's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
