Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bio-Bee Sde Eliyahu Ltd. is active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area with 2 pending office actions currently under review. These matters are assigned to 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's filings cover a variety of technical subjects within the broader chemistry field. The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, which means the company must address the specific requirements and feedback of 2 different officials. This distribution of 2 pending office actions across multiple examiners indicates a diversified prosecution environment.
The busiest examiner for the company is WATTS, JENNA A, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending office action is one of the 2 pending office actions for the portfolio. Having 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units involved means that the company's patent strategy is not limited to a single point of failure or a single examiner's discretion. For a practitioner, this requires monitoring 2 distinct timelines and adapting to the procedural nuances of 2 distinct art units within the Chemistry & Materials sector. The presence of 1 busiest examiner pending office action under WATTS, JENNA A highlights the most active point of contact in an otherwise balanced workload.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WATTS, JENNA A | 1 | 48.6% | +53.9% |
| GONZALES, JOSEPHINE MARIA | 1 | 26.6% | +38.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17639800 | NOVEL METHODS FOR REARING AND CONTROLLED RELEASE OF PREDATORY MITES | GONZALES, JOSEPHINE MARIA | 8d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17639800 | NOVEL METHODS FOR REARING AND CONTROLLED RELEASE OF PREDATORY MITES | GONZALES, JOSEPHINE MARIA | 8d overdue |
| 18547603 | FOOD SOURCE FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS AND METHODS THEREOF | WATTS, JENNA A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1791 | 1 |
| 1631 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18547603 | FOOD SOURCE FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS AND METHODS THEREOF | WATTS, JENNA A | 1791 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 23, 2023 |
| 17639800 | NOVEL METHODS FOR REARING AND CONTROLLED RELEASE OF PREDATORY MITES | GONZALES, JOSEPHINE MARIA | 1631 | §101§103DP | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Mar 02, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial