Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
BIO PROTECTANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. has a highly concentrated patent prosecution profile within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company currently faces 1 pending office action, which is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused and narrow scope of current activity at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is NGUYEN, JOHN P, who is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending office action currently on record. This concentration means that the company's immediate prosecution success depends entirely on the interactions with 1 distinct examiner and the standards of the 1 distinct art unit involved. For a portfolio with this specific workload, the administrative burden is low, but the strategic importance of the individual case is high as it represents the entirety of the company's active examination pipeline.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, JOHN P | 1 | 43.9% | +41.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19342419 | FABRIC MATERIAL INFUSED OR IMPREGNATED WITH ONE OR MORE BENEFICIAL AGENTS AND METHOD OF MAKING THEREOF | NGUYEN, JOHN P | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19342419 | FABRIC MATERIAL INFUSED OR IMPREGNATED WITH ONE OR MORE BENEFICIAL AGENTS AND METHOD OF MAKING THEREOF | NGUYEN, JOHN P | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1619 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19342419 | FABRIC MATERIAL INFUSED OR IMPREGNATED WITH ONE OR MORE BENEFICIAL AGENTS AND METHOD OF MAKING THEREOF | NGUYEN, JOHN P | 1619 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Sep 26, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial