Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Biocom Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, KATHERINE KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, in 1 distinct art unit. The company's current patent prosecution is focused on this single interaction at the USPTO.
KATHERINE KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER is the busiest examiner for the company, as she is responsible for the 1 pending office action that makes up the full portfolio. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution environment is concentrated. The success of this action will be determined by the specific requirements of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector and the individual review of this examiner.
The presence of just 1 pending office action suggests a specific intellectual property focus. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company has a single point of contact for its current prosecution efforts. This 1 pending action represents the entirety of Biocom Co. Ltd.'s current engagement with the office in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE | 1 | 26.6% | +31.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19143853 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING MACHINE-LEARNING-BASED DIET RECOMMENDATION SERVICE BY USING FOOD INTOLERANCE TEST (IGG ANTIBODY ANALYSIS), AND SERVICE PROVISION SERVER USED THEREFOR | KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19143853 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING MACHINE-LEARNING-BASED DIET RECOMMENDATION SERVICE BY USING FOOD INTOLERANCE TEST (IGG ANTIBODY ANALYSIS), AND SERVICE PROVISION SERVER USED THEREFOR | KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19143853 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING MACHINE-LEARNING-BASED DIET RECOMMENDATION SERVICE BY USING FOOD INTOLERANCE TEST (IGG ANTIBODY ANALYSIS), AND SERVICE PROVISION SERVER USED THEREFOR | KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE | 3687 | §101§102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 04, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial