Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Biograil Aps

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Biograil Aps maintains 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, all of whom are located within 1 distinct art unit. VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. The concentration of 3 pending office actions within 1 distinct art unit suggests a very specific technical focus for the company's patent applications.

Because the portfolio involves 3 distinct examiners but only 1 distinct art unit, the company can compare how different individuals within the same technical group interpret its disclosures. KATHLEEN PAIGE VOKES is one of the 3 distinct examiners contributing to this internal baseline. This scenario allows practitioners to identify art unit-specific trends while managing the individual preferences of each examiner. The 3 pending office actions provide a moderate amount of data for assessing the prosecution landscape within this single art unit.

The Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area requires precision, and having 3 pending office actions allows for a more diversified approach than a single filing. While KATHLEEN PAIGE VOKES holds 1 pending office action, the other two actions are handled by different examiners, providing multiple perspectives within the same 1 distinct art unit. This structure helps the company refine its claims based on varied feedback from within a single specialized group at the USPTO.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE 1 56.3% +27.5%
WHITROCK, ZACHARIAH KIRBY 1 100.0% +0.0%
KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH 1 100.0% +0.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18699199 DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE WITH OFFSET ACTUATOR MECHANISM WHITROCK, ZACHARIAH KIRBY —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18728044 DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE WITH DETACHMENT CAPABILITIES VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE —
18698322 HIGH-DOSE DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18728044 DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE WITH DETACHMENT CAPABILITIES VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18728044 DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE WITH DETACHMENT CAPABILITIES VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE 3783 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 10, 2024
18699199 DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE WITH OFFSET ACTUATOR MECHANISM WHITROCK, ZACHARIAH KIRBY 3783 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 05, 2024
18698322 HIGH-DOSE DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH 3783 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 03, 2024

Managing Biograil Aps's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Biograil Aps have?

Biograil Aps has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Biograil Aps applications?

Kathleen Paige Vokes has the most, with 1 of Biograil Aps's pending office actions.

What technology area are Biograil Aps's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month