Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bioinformatics Solutions Inc. has 1 pending office action currently active. This prosecution task is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, while the data shows 0 distinct art units associated with the pending work. EZEWOKO, MICHAEL I is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for 1 pending office action.
The absence of multiple examiners indicates a focus for the portfolio's current patent office interactions. Because 1 pending office action is the entirety of the active docket, the company's immediate prosecution profile is defined by the progress of this file. Practitioners must focus on the specific requirements of the 1 examiner involved, as there is no diversity in the current examiner pool to mitigate individual examiner trends. The data showing 0 distinct art units suggests a unique administrative status for the pending matter. Without additional active files, the portfolio's momentum is dependent on the resolution of this 1 office action, leaving no room for broader prosecution trends to emerge. This singular point of contact with EZEWOKO, MICHAEL I requires a response strategy that prioritizes direct communication to resolve any outstanding rejections.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EZEWOKO, MICHAEL I | 1 | 61.5% | +51.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18347105 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERSONALIZED NEOANTIGEN PREDICTION | EZEWOKO, MICHAEL I | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18347105 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERSONALIZED NEOANTIGEN PREDICTION | EZEWOKO, MICHAEL I | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18347105 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERSONALIZED NEOANTIGEN PREDICTION | EZEWOKO, MICHAEL I | — | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 05, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial