Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL | 1 | 57.4% | +48.8% |
| GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY | 1 | 67.6% | +54.3% |
| GIERE, REBECCA M | 1 | 73.5% | +32.9% |
| SINES, BRIAN J | 1 | 80.4% | +4.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18030654 | Method for Sample Collection and Metering | SINES, BRIAN J | 14d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18249091 | Method for Correction for Sample Volume | WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL | 120d overdue |
| 18249095 | Oxidative Mass Labeling | GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY | 86d overdue |
| 18249087 | Cellular Response Analysis Method | GIERE, REBECCA M | 58d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1758 | 1 |
| 1798 | 1 |
| 1677 | 1 |
| 1796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18249091 | Method for Correction for Sample Volume | WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL | 1758 | Other | Non-Final OA | 120d overdue | Pending | Apr 14, 2023 |
| 18249095 | Oxidative Mass Labeling | GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY | 1798 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 86d overdue | Pending | Apr 14, 2023 |
| 18249087 | Cellular Response Analysis Method | GIERE, REBECCA M | 1677 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 58d overdue | Pending | Apr 14, 2023 |
| 18030654 | Method for Sample Collection and Metering | SINES, BRIAN J | 1796 | §103 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Apr 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial