Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Biopass S A

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Biopass S A maintains 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company's current prosecution activity is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, which minimizes the diversity of examiner perspectives the applicant must address. This streamlined structure is beneficial for maintaining a consistent legal position across the portfolio.

DORNA, CARRIE R serves as the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. This concentration allows the applicant to focus their legal resources on a single examiner's interpretation of medical device and mechanical engineering standards. Success in this 1 pending office action will likely depend on the practitioner's ability to align their arguments with the specific preferences of this examiner.

Since there is only 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution process is shielded from the variability often found when applications are spread across multiple USPTO divisions. The 1 pending office action represents the total current workload, making it the central focus for the company's intellectual property strategy in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner ensures that the prosecution remains highly focused and manageable.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DORNA, CARRIE R 1 72.3% +27.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17633109 DEVICE FOR EMITTING A MAGNETIC FIELD DORNA, CARRIE R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17633109 DEVICE FOR EMITTING A MAGNETIC FIELD DORNA, CARRIE R 3791 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 04, 2022

Managing Biopass S A's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month