Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

BIORCHESTRA CO., LTD.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

BIORCHESTRA CO., LTD. is active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area and currently has 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a focused and limited scope of active patent office engagement. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current filings are concentrated within a specific technical niche of the pharmaceutical industry, rather than being spread across multiple review groups.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE, who is overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As the total count of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is responsible for the entirety of the company's active prosecution workload. This creates a highly focused interaction where the company's immediate patent outcomes are tied to a single examiner's review. For practitioners, this profile shows a very simple prosecution landscape with no current diversification across different examiners or art units in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field at this time.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE 1 58.1% +65.0%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18259007 USE OF MIRNA-485 INHIBITORS FOR INDUCING HAIR GROWTH KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1635 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18259007 USE OF MIRNA-485 INHIBITORS FOR INDUCING HAIR GROWTH KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE 1635 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 22, 2023

Managing BIORCHESTRA CO., LTD.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month