Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
BIOTECH FOODS S.L. currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, representing a singular point of review for the company's active docket. This concentration indicates that the company's immediate legal efforts are focused on a specific food-related biotechnological innovation. The pending office action is the only active case currently under review for this portfolio.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is TINSLEY, BRENDAN THOMAS, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. The trajectory of the company's current prosecution is tied to the individual requirements of this examiner. For a practitioner, it is important to tailor arguments to the specific preferences of this official within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals art unit. The success of the 1 pending office action will be a key indicator of the company's ability to protect its innovations in this sector. Addressing the specific technical concerns of this examiner is essential for the company's near-term patent goals.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| No statute on record | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TINSLEY, BRENDAN THOMAS | 1 | 58.7% | +73.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18001110 | METHOD FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF AN EDIBLE AND STERILIZABLE POROUS 3D SCAFFOLD USEFUL FOR CULTURED MEAT LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION | TINSLEY, BRENDAN THOMAS | 91d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1634 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18001110 | METHOD FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF AN EDIBLE AND STERILIZABLE POROUS 3D SCAFFOLD USEFUL FOR CULTURED MEAT LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION | TINSLEY, BRENDAN THOMAS | 1634 | Other | Final Rejection | 91d overdue | Pending | Dec 08, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial