Technology area: Networking & Security
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Bitsight Technologies Inc. has 5 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These actions are spread across 5 distinct art units, showing a high degree of technical diversity for a small number of pending cases. The portfolio involves 5 distinct examiners, meaning each of the 5 pending actions is being reviewed by a different person. This lack of examiner overlap requires a separate prosecution approach for every active matter, as there is no single point of contact for multiple applications.
MANIWANG, JOSEPH R is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 pending office action. With 5 pending actions and 5 distinct examiners, the workload is entirely decentralized. The 5 distinct art units involved indicate that the company's security innovations are being scrutinized by 5 different specialized networking and security units at the USPTO. This distribution of pending actions to both distinct examiners and distinct art units suggests that the company's intellectual property is highly specialized and distributed across the USPTO's security-related divisions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| Double-patenting only | 3 (60%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | 1 | 85.4% | +14.3% |
| NAHAR, SAYEDA S | 1 | 76.2% | +21.0% |
| RANDHAWA, MANDISH K | 1 | 65.4% | +27.2% |
| HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI | 1 | 87.9% | +7.1% |
| KORSAK, OLEG | 1 | 85.7% | +7.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18302925 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXTERNAL DETECTION OF MISCONFIGURED SYSTEMS | KORSAK, OLEG | 17d overdue |
| 19220387 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING ASSET IMPORTANCE IN SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | — |
| 18359183 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING CYBERSECURITY EFFICACY OF ENTITIES AGAINST COMMON CONTROL AND MATURITY FRAMEWORKS USING EXTERNALLY-OBSERVED DATASETS | HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18429539 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INFERRING ENTITY RELATIONSHIPS VIA NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS OF USERS OR USER DEVICES | RANDHAWA, MANDISH K | 71d overdue |
| 19220387 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING ASSET IMPORTANCE IN SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | — |
| 18678378 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING CYBERSECURITY RISK BASED ON ENTITY FIRMOGRAPHICS | NAHAR, SAYEDA S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2453 | 1 |
| 2435 | 1 |
| 2477 | 1 |
| 2407 | 1 |
| 2492 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19220387 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING ASSET IMPORTANCE IN SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | 2453 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 28, 2025 |
| 18678378 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING CYBERSECURITY RISK BASED ON ENTITY FIRMOGRAPHICS | NAHAR, SAYEDA S | 2435 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 30, 2024 |
| 18429539 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INFERRING ENTITY RELATIONSHIPS VIA NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS OF USERS OR USER DEVICES | RANDHAWA, MANDISH K | 2477 | DP | Final Rejection | 71d overdue | Pending | Feb 01, 2024 |
| 18359183 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING CYBERSECURITY EFFICACY OF ENTITIES AGAINST COMMON CONTROL AND MATURITY FRAMEWORKS USING EXTERNALLY-OBSERVED DATASETS | HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI | 2407 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 26, 2023 |
| 18302925 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXTERNAL DETECTION OF MISCONFIGURED SYSTEMS | KORSAK, OLEG | 2492 | DP | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Apr 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBitsight Technologies Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.
Joseph R Maniwang has the most, with 1 of Bitsight Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
