Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Bitsight Technologies Inc. currently manages 5 pending office actions within the Networking & Security technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 4 distinct art units. The presence of 5 distinct examiners for these actions indicates that each pending matter is being handled by an individual at the patent office.
JOSEPH R MANIWANG is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because the distinct examiners match the pending office actions, the workload is distributed with 1 action per examiner. This distribution across 4 distinct art units requires the applicant to engage with examiner prosecution styles. Each of the pending office actions represents a point of engagement with the examiners currently assigned to the Networking & Security applications. The 4 distinct art units provide the administrative framework for these pending office actions. The 5 pending office actions are the current focus of the Networking & Security portfolio. The examiners ensure that applications are being reviewed.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| Double-patenting only | 3 (60%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | 1 | 85.5% | +13.8% |
| NAHAR, SAYEDA S | 1 | 75.6% | +21.5% |
| RANDHAWA, MANDISH K | 1 | 65.2% | +27.2% |
| HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI | 1 | 87.1% | +6.1% |
| KORSAK, OLEG | 1 | 85.7% | +7.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18302925 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXTERNAL DETECTION OF MISCONFIGURED SYSTEMS | KORSAK, OLEG | 17d overdue |
| 19220387 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING ASSET IMPORTANCE IN SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | — |
| 18359183 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING CYBERSECURITY EFFICACY OF ENTITIES AGAINST COMMON CONTROL AND MATURITY FRAMEWORKS USING EXTERNALLY-OBSERVED DATASETS | HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18429539 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INFERRING ENTITY RELATIONSHIPS VIA NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS OF USERS OR USER DEVICES | RANDHAWA, MANDISH K | 71d overdue |
| 19220387 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING ASSET IMPORTANCE IN SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | — |
| 18678378 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING CYBERSECURITY RISK BASED ON ENTITY FIRMOGRAPHICS | NAHAR, SAYEDA S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2435 | 1 |
| 2477 | 1 |
| 2407 | 1 |
| 2492 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19220387 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING ASSET IMPORTANCE IN SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT | MANIWANG, JOSEPH R | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 28, 2025 |
| 18678378 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING CYBERSECURITY RISK BASED ON ENTITY FIRMOGRAPHICS | NAHAR, SAYEDA S | 2435 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 30, 2024 |
| 18429539 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INFERRING ENTITY RELATIONSHIPS VIA NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS OF USERS OR USER DEVICES | RANDHAWA, MANDISH K | 2477 | DP | Final Rejection | 71d overdue | Pending | Feb 01, 2024 |
| 18359183 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING CYBERSECURITY EFFICACY OF ENTITIES AGAINST COMMON CONTROL AND MATURITY FRAMEWORKS USING EXTERNALLY-OBSERVED DATASETS | HAJIABBASI, AMIR MAHDI | 2407 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 26, 2023 |
| 18302925 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXTERNAL DETECTION OF MISCONFIGURED SYSTEMS | KORSAK, OLEG | 2492 | DP | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Apr 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial