Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

BK Giulini GmbH

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

BK Giulini GmbH holds a company patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. Currently, the portfolio has 3 pending office actions, which are distributed across 3 distinct art units. This indicates that the company's chemical technologies are being evaluated across a variety of technical classifications. The 3 pending office actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, meaning the company is engaging with three different perspectives at the patent office.

BEKKER, KELLY JO is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This shows that the 3 pending office actions are split evenly among the 3 distinct examiners. Because each action is in a different art unit, the company must navigate the unique standards of 3 distinct art units. This level of activity suggests a diversified approach to securing patent rights within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. Practitioners should note that the 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units provide a broad range of examiner feedback. The 3 pending office actions represent the current active engagement for the company's Chemistry & Materials portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BEKKER, KELLY JO 1 16.8% +35.1%
GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 1 36.0% +34.9%
MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. 1 15.7% +24.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18267171 PROCESSED DAIRY-TYPE FOOD PRODUCTS MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. 42d overdue
18274907 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING A VEGAN EDIBLE PRODUCT FROM EDIBLE NON-ANIMAL PROTEINS BEKKER, KELLY JO 84d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18267171 PROCESSED DAIRY-TYPE FOOD PRODUCTS MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. 42d overdue
18274863 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING A VEGAN EDIBLE PRODUCT FROM EDIBLE NON-ANIMAL PROTEINS GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 35d overdue
18274907 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING A VEGAN EDIBLE PRODUCT FROM EDIBLE NON-ANIMAL PROTEINS BEKKER, KELLY JO 84d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1792 1
1759 1
1793 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18274907 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING A VEGAN EDIBLE PRODUCT FROM EDIBLE NON-ANIMAL PROTEINS BEKKER, KELLY JO 1792 §103§112 Final Rejection 84d Pending Jul 28, 2023
18274863 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING A VEGAN EDIBLE PRODUCT FROM EDIBLE NON-ANIMAL PROTEINS GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 1759 §103 Final Rejection 35d overdue Pending Jul 28, 2023
18267171 PROCESSED DAIRY-TYPE FOOD PRODUCTS MCCLAIN, TYNESHA L. 1793 §103§112 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Jun 14, 2023

Managing BK Giulini GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does BK Giulini GmbH have?

BK Giulini GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most BK Giulini GmbH applications?

Kelly Jo Bekker has the most, with 1 of BK Giulini GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are BK Giulini GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month