Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bk Technologies Inc. maintains a portfolio in the Communications technology area. Currently, there is 1 pending office action associated with this entity. This single active case defines the present prosecution landscape for the company's intellectual property.
The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very specific technical focus, as the filings have not been distributed across different examination groups. For the practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for varying art unit cultures or multiple examiner personalities.
OBAYANJU, OMONIYI is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is 1 pending office action in total, OBAYANJU, OMONIYI is the sole official reviewing the company's active applications.
A practitioner working on this portfolio can benefit from the consistency of having 1 distinct examiner. The focus remains entirely on the 1 pending office action, allowing for a deep dive into the specific requirements of the examiner. This centralized approach simplifies the management of the 1 distinct art unit involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OBAYANJU, OMONIYI | 1 | 71.7% | +24.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18145323 | USING A HUB DEVICE FOR LAND MOBILE RADIO CONFIGURATION | OBAYANJU, OMONIYI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18145323 | USING A HUB DEVICE FOR LAND MOBILE RADIO CONFIGURATION | OBAYANJU, OMONIYI | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2645 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18145323 | USING A HUB DEVICE FOR LAND MOBILE RADIO CONFIGURATION | OBAYANJU, OMONIYI | 2645 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBk Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Omoniyi Obayanju has the most, with 1 of Bk Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
