Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
12 pending office actions • 7 art units • 12 examiners • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (17%) |
| §101 + other | 8 (67%) |
| §103 only | 1 (8%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (8%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 1 | 42.0% | +37.7% |
| CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T | 1 | 74.4% | +32.9% |
| RUIZ, ANGELICA | 1 | 83.1% | +14.5% |
| HARRINGTON, MICHAEL P | 1 | 24.8% | +16.6% |
| RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY | 1 | 4.7% | +7.9% |
| WHITAKER, ANDREW B | 1 | 18.7% | +18.7% |
| ARAQUE JR, GERARDO | 1 | 9.5% | +15.9% |
| SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z | 1 | 27.6% | +40.0% |
| BOND, REED MADISON | 1 | 9.1% | +19.4% |
| MONTALVO, CARLOS FERNANDO | 1 | 15.8% | -2.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18205982 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CREATING A BACK-UP DOCKET | BOND, REED MADISON | 89d overdue |
| 17722178 | PRE-CODED AUTOMATIC DOCKETING | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 50d overdue |
| 18645124 | ALERTS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION METHOD AND TOOL | HARRINGTON, MICHAEL P | 10d overdue |
| 19212480 | DOCUMENT SPLITTING TOOL | RUIZ, ANGELICA | 26d |
| 18108387 | PATENT FAMILY CITATION LANDSCAPE TOOL | MONTALVO, CARLOS FERNANDO | 42d |
| 18369711 | PATENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS HAVING EXPERT DOCKETING | RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY | 63d |
| 18351425 | STRUCTURED ANALYSIS RELATING TO DEADLINE DRIVEN PROJECT MANAGEMENT | ARAQUE JR, GERARDO | 71d |
| 19262064 | PATENT MAPPING | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18205982 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CREATING A BACK-UP DOCKET | BOND, REED MADISON | 89d overdue |
| 18645124 | ALERTS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION METHOD AND TOOL | HARRINGTON, MICHAEL P | 10d overdue |
| 19212480 | DOCUMENT SPLITTING TOOL | RUIZ, ANGELICA | 26d |
| 18351425 | STRUCTURED ANALYSIS RELATING TO DEADLINE DRIVEN PROJECT MANAGEMENT | ARAQUE JR, GERARDO | 71d |
| 19262064 | PATENT MAPPING | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | — |
| 19221503 | AUTOMATED PATENT CLAIM SCOPE CONCEPT MAPPING | CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T | — |
| 18351428 | SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC REMINDERS FOR ITEMS WITH LEGAL DEADLINES | WHITAKER, ANDREW B | — |
| 18351416 | DYNAMIC DATA RESOURCE DRIVEN USER INTERFACE TOOL | SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3629 | 4 |
| 3626 | 2 |
| 2169 | 1 |
| 2154 | 1 |
| 3628 | 1 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19262064 | PATENT MAPPING | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 2169 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 07, 2025 |
| 19221503 | AUTOMATED PATENT CLAIM SCOPE CONCEPT MAPPING | CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 29, 2025 |
| 19212480 | DOCUMENT SPLITTING TOOL | RUIZ, ANGELICA | 2154 | §101§112Other | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | May 19, 2025 |
| 18645124 | ALERTS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION METHOD AND TOOL | HARRINGTON, MICHAEL P | 3628 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 10d overdue | Pending | Apr 24, 2024 |
| 18369711 | PATENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS HAVING EXPERT DOCKETING | RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY | 3626 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 63d | Pending | Sep 18, 2023 |
| 18351428 | SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC REMINDERS FOR ITEMS WITH LEGAL DEADLINES | WHITAKER, ANDREW B | 3629 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 12, 2023 |
| 18351425 | STRUCTURED ANALYSIS RELATING TO DEADLINE DRIVEN PROJECT MANAGEMENT | ARAQUE JR, GERARDO | 3629 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 71d | Pending | Jul 12, 2023 |
| 18351416 | DYNAMIC DATA RESOURCE DRIVEN USER INTERFACE TOOL | SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z | 3625 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 12, 2023 |
| 18205982 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CREATING A BACK-UP DOCKET | BOND, REED MADISON | 3624 | §103 | Final Rejection | 89d overdue | Pending | Jun 05, 2023 |
| 18108387 | PATENT FAMILY CITATION LANDSCAPE TOOL | MONTALVO, CARLOS FERNANDO | 3629 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 42d | Pending | Feb 10, 2023 |
| 17833200 | AUTOMATED DOCKETING CHECKER | CHEN, WENREN | 3626 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 06, 2022 |
| 17722178 | PRE-CODED AUTOMATIC DOCKETING | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 3629 | §101 | Final Rejection | 50d overdue | Pending | Apr 15, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial