Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Blue Laser Fusion Inc. is navigating 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. While there are 2 distinct examiners assigned to these cases, they both operate within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that although the company is dealing with different individuals, the administrative and technical standards remain consistent across the current portfolio. The focus remains grouped within a single specialized section of the USPTO.
WASIL, DANIEL D is the busiest examiner for the company, currently managing 1 pending office action. Given the total of 2 pending office actions, the workload is shared between the 2 distinct examiners. The fact that 1 distinct art unit houses both cases implies a high degree of subject matter similarity in the company's transportation and mechanical systems filings. Practitioners should leverage the common art unit standards to streamline the prosecution of both pending matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WASIL, DANIEL D | 1 | 79.9% | +24.8% |
| CAMACHO ALANIS, FERNANDA ADRIANA | 1 | 56.5% | +41.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18526618 | SOLID TARGET STRUCTURE WITH A LOW IGNITION TEMPERATURE | WASIL, DANIEL D | 28d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18526618 | SOLID TARGET STRUCTURE WITH A LOW IGNITION TEMPERATURE | WASIL, DANIEL D | 28d |
| 18500952 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC HBEAM SHAPED LASER COUPLED TO OPTICAL CAVITY | CAMACHO ALANIS, FERNANDA ADRIANA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3646 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18526618 | SOLID TARGET STRUCTURE WITH A LOW IGNITION TEMPERATURE | WASIL, DANIEL D | 3646 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Dec 01, 2023 |
| 18500952 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC HBEAM SHAPED LASER COUPLED TO OPTICAL CAVITY | CAMACHO ALANIS, FERNANDA ADRIANA | 3646 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 02, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBlue Laser Fusion Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
Daniel D Wasil has the most, with 1 of Blue Laser Fusion Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
