Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Bluwave Inc. maintains a company patent portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently has 2 pending office actions. These 2 actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners, ensuring that each pending matter is under the review of a different individual at the patent office. This structure allows for diverse perspectives on the company's technical disclosures.
The prosecution activity is spread across 2 distinct art units. With 2 pending office actions and 2 art units, each active application is being examined in a different technical environment. This distribution requires the company to adapt to the specific requirements and trends of 2 separate art units simultaneously. Practitioners must be prepared to navigate different sets of prior art and examination standards across these 2 distinct art units.
MCCLEARY, CAITLIN RENEE is the busiest examiner for Bluwave Inc., with 1 pending office action currently assigned. Because there are 2 distinct examiners for the 2 pending office actions, the workload is split equally. MCCLEARY, CAITLIN RENEE manages 1 action, while the other distinct examiner manages the remaining 1, reflecting a decentralized prosecution profile. This balance across 2 art units and 2 examiners means that the company's patent strategy is not overly reliant on any single examiner's tendencies.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KASENGE, CHARLES R | 1 | 83.9% | +13.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18613216 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING OPTIMIZATION AND GRID BALANCING | KASENGE, CHARLES R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18613216 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING OPTIMIZATION AND GRID BALANCING | KASENGE, CHARLES R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2116 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18613216 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING OPTIMIZATION AND GRID BALANCING | KASENGE, CHARLES R | 2116 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBluwave Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Charles R Kasenge has the most, with 1 of Bluwave Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
