Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bohnas Innovations LLC has a portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This active case represents the current state of the company's patent prosecution efforts in this field.
The data indicates that the portfolio is being examined by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. This suggests a focused technical scope for the company's filings. For the practitioner, this concentration simplifies the prosecution process by limiting the number of USPTO officials and departments involved.
NORTH, ISABELLA SARAH HYO SO is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As there is 1 pending office action in total, this examiner has sole responsibility for the current active matter. A successful prosecution will depend on addressing the specific concerns of this one examiner.
The presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit allows for a consistent and focused prosecution strategy. The practitioner can dedicate resources to the 1 pending office action without the complexity of managing multiple examiners. This centralized approach is a defining feature of the company's current patent portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NORTH, ISABELLA SARAH HYO SO | 1 | 67.7% | +9.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18087358 | DUAL LUMEN IV ADMINISTRATION SET | NORTH, ISABELLA SARAH HYO SO | 32d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18087358 | DUAL LUMEN IV ADMINISTRATION SET | NORTH, ISABELLA SARAH HYO SO | 3783 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 32d overdue | Pending | Dec 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial