6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 19 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (17%) |
| §103 only | 3 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAWAN, VIJAY B | 1 | 88.2% | +11.4% |
| LOWEN, NICHOLAS DANIEL | 1 | 69.2% | +80.0% |
| HUYNH, THANG GIA | 1 | 79.5% | +41.0% |
| ANDERSON, SCOTT C | 1 | 58.5% | +31.4% |
| WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 1 | 35.9% | +26.1% |
| LEVEL, BARBARA HENRY | 1 | 71.4% | +28.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18962528 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED CONTEXT-AUGMENTED QUESTION RESPONSE SERVICES | CHAWAN, VIJAY B | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18493442 | Dynamic Tagging | LEVEL, BARBARA HENRY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18510581 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING ENHANCED DOCUMENTS FOR PERFECT AUTOMATED PARSING | WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 44d overdue |
| 18962528 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED CONTEXT-AUGMENTED QUESTION RESPONSE SERVICES | CHAWAN, VIJAY B | — |
| 18632160 | CONTENT AUTHORING TOOL WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATION | LOWEN, NICHOLAS DANIEL | — |
| 18584235 | SCREENSHOT PREVENTION FOR PROTECTED CONTENT | HUYNH, THANG GIA | — |
| 18434675 | MACHINE LEARNING DOCUMENT PARSER | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | — |
| 18493442 | Dynamic Tagging | LEVEL, BARBARA HENRY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2658 | 1 |
| 2653 | 1 |
| 2611 | 1 |
| 2156 | 1 |
| 4100 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18962528 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED CONTEXT-AUGMENTED QUESTION RESPONSE SERVICES | CHAWAN, VIJAY B | 2658 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
| 18632160 | CONTENT AUTHORING TOOL WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATION | LOWEN, NICHOLAS DANIEL | 2653 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 10, 2024 |
| 18584235 | SCREENSHOT PREVENTION FOR PROTECTED CONTENT | HUYNH, THANG GIA | 2611 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 22, 2024 |
| 18434675 | MACHINE LEARNING DOCUMENT PARSER | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 06, 2024 |
| 18510581 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING ENHANCED DOCUMENTS FOR PERFECT AUTOMATED PARSING | WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 2156 | DP | Non-Final OA | 44d overdue | Pending | Nov 15, 2023 |
| 18493442 | Dynamic Tagging | LEVEL, BARBARA HENRY | 4100 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial