Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Bomag GmbH

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, JONG SUK 1 17.7% +25.3%
PATEL, KALPIT CHANDRAKANT 1 100.0% +0.0%
HARTMANN, GARY S 1 72.6% +19.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17600269 SOIL-COMPACTING MACHINE HAVING AN ELECTRIC MOTOR AND METHOD FOR OPERATION HARTMANN, GARY S 28d overdue
18792677 ROAD CONSTRUCTION MACHINE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD PAVER OR FEEDER, AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING SUCH A ROAD CONSTRUCTION MACHINE LEE, JONG SUK
18486406 CONSTRUCTION MACHINE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD PAVER OR TANDEM ROLLER PATEL, KALPIT CHANDRAKANT

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17600269 SOIL-COMPACTING MACHINE HAVING AN ELECTRIC MOTOR AND METHOD FOR OPERATION HARTMANN, GARY S 28d overdue
18792677 ROAD CONSTRUCTION MACHINE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD PAVER OR FEEDER, AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING SUCH A ROAD CONSTRUCTION MACHINE LEE, JONG SUK

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3671 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18792677 ROAD CONSTRUCTION MACHINE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD PAVER OR FEEDER, AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING SUCH A ROAD CONSTRUCTION MACHINE LEE, JONG SUK §103 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 02, 2024
18486406 CONSTRUCTION MACHINE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD PAVER OR TANDEM ROLLER PATEL, KALPIT CHANDRAKANT 3671 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 13, 2023
17600269 SOIL-COMPACTING MACHINE HAVING AN ELECTRIC MOTOR AND METHOD FOR OPERATION HARTMANN, GARY S 3671 §103§112 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Mar 10, 2022

Managing Bomag GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month