Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
BOMILL AB has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current patent activity is focused on a single technical matter within a specific department of the USPTO.
KALYANAVENKA K KUMAR is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. This single examiner is responsible for the company's entire pending prosecution workload. For a practitioner, this means that the success of the current patent strategy in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field depends on the specific examination style of KALYANAVENKA K KUMAR and the guidelines of the art unit.
Because there is 1 pending office action, there is no distribution of work across different examiners. The company's immediate patent goals are centralized within this one proceeding. This focused approach means that the practitioner can devote all resources to addressing the specific requirements of the 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved in the case.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K | 1 | 72.9% | +18.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18859571 | OBJECT DISTRIBUTION AND CONVEYING ARRANGEMENT AND SYSTEM | KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3653 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18859571 | OBJECT DISTRIBUTION AND CONVEYING ARRANGEMENT AND SYSTEM | KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K | 3653 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBOMILL AB has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Kalyanavenka K Kumar has the most, with 1 of BOMILL AB's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
