Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bond High Performance 3D Technology B V currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution activity is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit, reflecting a concentrated intellectual property strategy. The examiner overseeing this matter is THROWER, LARRY W, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio.
The workload for THROWER, LARRY W consists of a busiest examiner pending action. This specific action represents the total current pending office actions for Bond High Performance 3D Technology B V in this sector. Because there is a distinct examiner involved, the prosecution team can focus on the preferences and historical patterns of this individual.
The concentration within a distinct art unit simplifies the technical requirements for the legal team. Practitioners can tailor their arguments to the specific standards of that unit without worrying about conflicting interpretations from other examiners. Success in this portfolio depends on the effective resolution of the application currently under review. By focusing on the specific feedback from THROWER, LARRY W, the company can navigate its current patent challenges in the Chemistry & Materials field.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| THROWER, LARRY W | 1 | 65.9% | +12.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16490257 | OBJECT MADE BY ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND METHOD TO PRODUCE SAID OBJECT | THROWER, LARRY W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16490257 | OBJECT MADE BY ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND METHOD TO PRODUCE SAID OBJECT | THROWER, LARRY W | 1754 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 30, 2019 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialBond High Performance 3D Technology B V has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Larry W Thrower has the most, with 1 of Bond High Performance 3D Technology B V's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
