Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Bone Solutions Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Bone Solutions Inc. is navigating 4 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are spread across 4 distinct examiners, meaning that every pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. This high ratio of examiners to actions suggests that the company is facing a diverse set of examination styles and perspectives across its current filings. Such a distribution requires the applicant to maintain a flexible prosecution strategy that can adapt to multiple different officials simultaneously.

The portfolio's activity spans 3 distinct art units, which provides some level of technical distribution within the patent office's organizational structure. WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL is identified as the busiest examiner, currently handling 1 pending office action. Although this examiner is the busiest, they only manage 1 of the 4 pending matters, reflecting the broad distribution of the workload across the examination corps. This lack of concentration means that the company must tailor its legal arguments to the specific preferences of four different officials to secure its intellectual property rights.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§102 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHARMA, YASHITA 1 81.8% +24.6%
WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL 1 61.0% +39.1%
COUGHLIN, DANIEL F 1 39.0% +18.6%
CRAIGO, WILLIAM A 1 49.2% +38.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18261133 Magnesium-Based Porous Coating for Orthopedic Implant SHARMA, YASHITA 25d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18261122 Orthopedic Implant and Methods of Use WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18261133 Magnesium-Based Porous Coating for Orthopedic Implant SHARMA, YASHITA 25d overdue
18000192 Bio-Material Composition and Methods of Use in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery CRAIGO, WILLIAM A 28d
18261122 Orthopedic Implant and Methods of Use WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL —
18000215 Bio-Material Composition and Methods of Use COUGHLIN, DANIEL F —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3774 2
1619 1
1615 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18261133 Magnesium-Based Porous Coating for Orthopedic Implant SHARMA, YASHITA 3774 §103 Non-Final OA 25d overdue Pending Jul 12, 2023
18261122 Orthopedic Implant and Methods of Use WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL 3774 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 12, 2023
18000215 Bio-Material Composition and Methods of Use COUGHLIN, DANIEL F 1619 §102Other Final Rejection — Pending Apr 18, 2023
18000192 Bio-Material Composition and Methods of Use in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery CRAIGO, WILLIAM A 1615 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Nov 29, 2022

Managing Bone Solutions Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month