Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Bounce Curl LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Bounce Curl LLC currently has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Both actions are located within a single distinct art unit, suggesting a very specific technical focus for this company's patent filings. The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, meaning each pending action is being reviewed by a different individual. This one-to-one ratio between actions and examiners is notable even for a portfolio of this small size. For practitioners, this suggests that while they must adapt to 2 different examiner styles, the technical standards and precedents of the single art unit will likely apply to both pending cases.

HORTON, ANDREW ALAN is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Since there are only 2 pending actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is split evenly between the two individuals. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit means that while the examiners are different, they likely work within the same technical department at the patent office. For practitioners, this means that each of the 2 pending office actions must be handled as a separate matter, as they are being reviewed by different examiners. However, the single art unit provides a consistent technical framework for both cases, which may simplify the overall prosecution strategy compared to portfolios spread across multiple units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HORTON, ANDREW ALAN 1 80.7% +17.8%
GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE 1 62.1% +29.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19320801 HAIR BRUSH GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE 22d overdue
19349474 HAIR BRUSH HORTON, ANDREW ALAN —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19320801 HAIR BRUSH GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE 22d overdue
19349474 HAIR BRUSH HORTON, ANDREW ALAN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3723 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19349474 HAIR BRUSH HORTON, ANDREW ALAN 3723 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 03, 2025
19320801 HAIR BRUSH GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE 3723 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending Sep 05, 2025

Managing Bounce Curl LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Bounce Curl LLC have?

Bounce Curl LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Bounce Curl LLC applications?

Andrew Alan Horton has the most, with 1 of Bounce Curl LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Bounce Curl LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month