Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

BP PULSE FLEET NORTH AMERICA INC.

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

BP PULSE FLEET NORTH AMERICA INC. currently manages 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 3 actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners, meaning no examiner is currently reviewing more than one application for the company. The portfolio is also spread across 3 distinct art units.

SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. With 3 pending office actions total, the company's current prosecution footprint is small and entirely decentralized. Practitioners must address the specific preferences of 3 different examiners across 3 different art units, as there is no overlap to leverage for a more unified prosecution strategy. This decentralized structure requires practitioners to be highly adaptable to the specific feedback of the 3 distinct examiners. Since there is no concentration in a single art unit, the company must navigate the nuances of 3 distinct art units simultaneously. Every pending office action represents a significant portion of the company's active portfolio, making each interaction with the 3 distinct examiners highly consequential for the firm's overall intellectual property position in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z 1 26.4% +37.5%
BEDEWI, RAMI NABIH 1 67.7% +27.9%
ABDI, AMARA 1 82.9% -7.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18817837 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED ELECTRICAL PANEL ANALYSIS ABDI, AMARA —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19304851 BATTERY PRECONDITIONING MANAGEMENT FOR VEHICLE FLEETS SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19304851 BATTERY PRECONDITIONING MANAGEMENT FOR VEHICLE FLEETS SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z —
18913382 ROUTE BASED BATTERY PRECONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND METHODS BEDEWI, RAMI NABIH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3625 1
3666 1
2668 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19304851 BATTERY PRECONDITIONING MANAGEMENT FOR VEHICLE FLEETS SANTIAGO-MERCED, FRANCIS Z 3625 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 20, 2025
18913382 ROUTE BASED BATTERY PRECONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND METHODS BEDEWI, RAMI NABIH 3666 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18817837 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED ELECTRICAL PANEL ANALYSIS ABDI, AMARA 2668 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2024

Managing BP PULSE FLEET NORTH AMERICA INC.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does BP PULSE FLEET NORTH AMERICA INC. have?

BP PULSE FLEET NORTH AMERICA INC. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most BP PULSE FLEET NORTH AMERICA INC. applications?

Francis Z Santiago-Merced has the most, with 1 of BP PULSE FLEET NORTH AMERICA INC.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are BP PULSE FLEET NORTH AMERICA INC.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month