Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Brainlab AG

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Brainlab AG has 7 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The matters are assigned to 7 distinct examiners across 5 distinct art units. KEFAYATI, SOORENA is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter.

The art-unit count indicates some technical grouping despite separate examiner assignments. Counsel can compare device-related claim issues within each art unit while preserving individualized analysis of the cited references and prosecution history. Because every matter has a distinct examiner, a common response framework should guide consistency without assuming uniform examiner treatment.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (33%)
§103 only2 (33%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
2
Semiconductors
33% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KEFAYATI, SOORENA 1 83.9% +7.3%
GROSS, JASON PATRICK 1 64.0% +43.3%
KATZ, DYLAN MICHAEL 1 86.4% +21.0%
TANINGCO, MARCUS H 1 81.0% +6.6%
CASCAIS, JUSTIN PHILIP 1 72.3% +6.5%
ORTEGA, MARTIN NATHAN 1 26.8% +32.8%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19208105 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROJECTING AN INCISION MARKER ONTO A PATIENT KEFAYATI, SOORENA —
18855367 ROBOTIC CALIBRATION KATZ, DYLAN MICHAEL —
18565330 ORIENTING AN X-RAY DEVICE BASED ON AN ULTRASOUND IMAGE TANINGCO, MARCUS H —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18996510 2D TRACKING MARKER GROSS, JASON PATRICK —
18038459 DETECTION OF FOREIGN OBJECTS IN INTRAOPERATIVE IMAGES CASCAIS, JUSTIN PHILIP —
17783675 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING INTERNAL ORGAN SHIFT ORTEGA, MARTIN NATHAN —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18996510 2D TRACKING MARKER GROSS, JASON PATRICK —
18855367 ROBOTIC CALIBRATION KATZ, DYLAN MICHAEL —
17783675 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING INTERNAL ORGAN SHIFT ORTEGA, MARTIN NATHAN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2884 2
3797 1
3657 1
2674 1
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19208105 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROJECTING AN INCISION MARKER ONTO A PATIENT KEFAYATI, SOORENA 2884 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 14, 2025
18996510 2D TRACKING MARKER GROSS, JASON PATRICK 3797 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18855367 ROBOTIC CALIBRATION KATZ, DYLAN MICHAEL 3657 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 09, 2024
18565330 ORIENTING AN X-RAY DEVICE BASED ON AN ULTRASOUND IMAGE TANINGCO, MARCUS H 2884 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 29, 2023
18038459 DETECTION OF FOREIGN OBJECTS IN INTRAOPERATIVE IMAGES CASCAIS, JUSTIN PHILIP 2674 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 24, 2023
17783675 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING INTERNAL ORGAN SHIFT ORTEGA, MARTIN NATHAN 3791 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 09, 2022

Managing Brainlab AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Brainlab AG have?

Brainlab AG has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 6 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Brainlab AG applications?

Soorena Kefayati has the most, with 1 of Brainlab AG's pending office actions.

What technology area are Brainlab AG's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month