Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Bread Financial Payments Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Bread Financial Payments Inc. has 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, demonstrating a broad distribution of the company's current intellectual property matters. This variety suggests that the company is developing several different technologies or business methods that fall under different administrative jurisdictions at the patent office.

The busiest examiner, GOLDBERG, IVAN R, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there are 3 distinct examiners, each examiner is handling a specific matter. This distribution across 3 distinct art units indicates a diverse set of technologies being pursued simultaneously. For the company, this means that prosecution success is not tied to a single examiner's discretion but is instead distributed across multiple points of review.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GOLDBERG, IVAN R 1 35.2% +35.9%
ALLADIN, AMBREEN A 1 24.6% +24.4%
TRAN, CHRISTINE M 1 41.2% +23.7%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179312 APPLYING FOR A CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT ON A MOBILE DEVICE AND PRE-POPULATING A CREDIT CARD NUMBER FIELD TRAN, CHRISTINE M 12d
18447266 MONITORING AND ALERTING SYSTEM AND METHOD GOLDBERG, IVAN R 27d
18328714 SUB-MERCHANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (SMID) INGESTION ALLADIN, AMBREEN A —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179312 APPLYING FOR A CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT ON A MOBILE DEVICE AND PRE-POPULATING A CREDIT CARD NUMBER FIELD TRAN, CHRISTINE M 12d
18447266 MONITORING AND ALERTING SYSTEM AND METHOD GOLDBERG, IVAN R 27d
18328714 SUB-MERCHANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (SMID) INGESTION ALLADIN, AMBREEN A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3619 1
3691 1
3694 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18447266 MONITORING AND ALERTING SYSTEM AND METHOD GOLDBERG, IVAN R 3619 §101§103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Aug 09, 2023
18328714 SUB-MERCHANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (SMID) INGESTION ALLADIN, AMBREEN A 3691 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 02, 2023
18179312 APPLYING FOR A CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT ON A MOBILE DEVICE AND PRE-POPULATING A CREDIT CARD NUMBER FIELD TRAN, CHRISTINE M 3694 §101§103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Mar 06, 2023

Managing Bread Financial Payments Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Bread Financial Payments Inc. have?

Bread Financial Payments Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Bread Financial Payments Inc. applications?

Ivan R Goldberg has the most, with 1 of Bread Financial Payments Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Bread Financial Payments Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month